21 Mar 2017 21:09:10
Marty fryatt is back in training apparently!


1.) 21 Mar 2017
21 Mar 2017 22:41:42
You sure he's not just got back on a train 🚂.


2.) 22 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 05:04:08
I don't care if he plays from now until the end of the season- he should never be offered another contract at our club. Thanks Matty but no thanks, your time here is up.


3.) 22 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 07:40:50
He should play the next 3 years for free.


4.) 22 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 09:40:48
If this is true, good luck to the lad. Matty did not ask to get injured. He is obviously battling against a career threatening injury and needs all our moral support.

The mentality of those who criticise Matty is sadly typical of some fans. We all know that footballers get paid very well, but that is another issue. Anyone with any decency will wish Matty all the best in his recovery. At his age and with his injury record, he is unlikely to be offered much more than a pay as he plays deal.

Good luck Matty, I hope you make a full recovery.


5.) 22 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 11:49:41
Don't think fans wish him bad.
It's more to do with a total lack of information from the club itself, whenever a player gets injured we get no updates from anyone in the club as when and if the player will return so then the rumours start about all sorts same as did with Reid
So come on Mcparland let's have informa tion from within the club and then the fans will understand the situation.


6.) 22 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 14:01:45
You don't have to blame the club for everything- the player could give an interview and talk about his injury and possibly let us know how he is working for the clubduring his recovery period. I'm sure he would be helping the club or the younger players somehow and isn't just having treatment and going home.
You have seriously got to question how and why we actually signed him though? An injury plagued player signs a lucrative contract and then gets injured? You don't need to be a rocket scientist to work out that ones not a good deal.


7.) 22 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 16:03:31
So you don't have to blame the club for everything, I wasn't just stating a fact that club fail to give enough information on injuries nothing else
If you question how and why we signed him then that's simple BLAME THE CLUB they signed him.


8.) 22 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 16:51:17
'The club and fawaz is easy to blame'? I'd be looking more at the medical staff? Who would do the medical? Is it in house or external?


9.) 22 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 16:53:54
I do agree it's bad pr not keeping fans informed but the player could give an interview? I can't work out why the club wouldn't let him do that or suggest that he should?


10.) 22 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 16:55:08
Obviously all the fans on here, injured at work, would refuse any money from their employers! They would leave their job immediately and accept no assistance, financial or otherwise . YEAH RIGHT!


11.) 22 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 18:04:00
Billy what if the injury happened before you went to work for that company? Slightly different slant to it then? Maybe the medical wasn't done thoroughly?


12.) 22 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 18:21:35
Any club can sign the odd crock but we seem to sign ours and someone else's share. enough is enough!
CARLO.


13.) 23 Mar 2017
22 Mar 2017 22:34:02
Just posted on banter page about matty fryatt record you might find it interesting reading
As regards sicknotes we supposedly sign Pinilos wasn't injury prone either before we signed him
Some clubs have bad injury records
Arsenal are an example of that and we are as bad
Could be bad luck or poor training
But players don't go out of their way to get injuries.