27 Jul 2013 07:22:56
The sun newspaper reporting Charlie on the move. Apparently he now is our first choice and that billy wants to get a deal done quickly. do not say it, I know it is the sun, lol

1.) 27 Jul 2013
Toss up between us and qpr

2.) 27 Jul 2013
Final piece of the jigsaw if we get him we are going up. Youuuu reds.

3.) 27 Jul 2013
We have 6 strikers miller on his way, Derbyshire scoring for fun, Blacktock, Henderson, Cox, Mackie. Save your money get Wes back and another defender. We are letting to many goals in pre season

4.) 27 Jul 2013
Its true just read it however it says qpr are interested, what are your thoughts?

5.) 27 Jul 2013
If forest go for austin I would expect a bottom dollar bid with potential add ons.

6.) 27 Jul 2013
Where does it say this? If Austin signs then I really do think its the start of happy days back at the city ground. After a first year of a lot of negativety and a lot of misunderstandings it has been proven our beloved club really is in the right hands. Thank u fawaz and thank u billy. U reds!

7.) 27 Jul 2013
We have 7 strikers* 7 of them that don't score goals like Austin. Get rid of Miller and Blackstock give Derbyshire till january to see if he's changed or sell him in january.

8.) 27 Jul 2013
With austin no doubt in my mind we will get top 2, I think we could work with counter attacking play with austin as the clinical finisher as our defence is abit rocky

9.) 27 Jul 2013
Letting to many goals in? its pre season all about getting your team fit and sorting which is best team, look at man u how many goals have they let in?

10.) 27 Jul 2013
Whoever keeps saying get Wes back? Are you real! He was a good blocker but a cart horse! Even slower than the backs we have now! It's pace at the back we need NOT sentiment!

11.) 27 Jul 2013
I know another player who impress me last pre season his name was miller pre season means note he will crumble when it comes to the season btw I'm talking about derbyshire

12.) 27 Jul 2013
I've seen this on bird site but it's not in my Sun; The articles surrounding it ARE there but not that one so it's most likely a sheep photoshop wind up-unless there are different versions of the paper? Anyone else confirm it's in print?