04 Jan 2018 12:36:58
So we sack a manager to replace him with one who is struggling with a team below us in the league? If the Heckingbottom reports are true then I just don't know where we go from here. I suppose he has managed Barnsley on a shoestring so I'm wondering if that's the way the Forest board want to go?

1.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 13:09:39
Mark Warburton 55.33% win rate
Paul heckingbottom 37.9% win rate.
Would that be a positive step forward ?

2.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 13:29:17
Lets have a successful team and get up to Lincoln. What a great choice Danny Cowley (Plus brother & father) would be for the City Ground. I know that you will feel its a gamble just as Derby did when Clough and Taylor joined from Hartlepool. All the current applicants have been sacked with poor win ratios, well look at these lads record! Come on Forest Board show some enterprise and courage.

3.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 13:38:17
Would be a gamble to appoint him now, if it goes wrong, we could be in a relegation fight. I read that despite the owners saying we were work in progress, and give us time, they expected MW to be challenging the top six. If that's true, I would suggest it's not going to be him.

4.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 14:29:46
Ff79 warburtons win rate is 38% in the league and about 41% if you include the cup run.

5.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 14:54:49
Rutland ff put warbos combined win % to make him look better even to he’s managed in the Micky mouse and Daffy Duck leagues north of the boarder.

6.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 15:19:03
If that’s his win rate what’s his loss rate I wonder?

7.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 15:27:02
Sorry Rutland you are wrong.
It's 55.33
His forest is nearly 41%
Still better than heckingbottoms

8.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 15:39:00
Warburton 197 games 109 wins 54 losses
Heckingbottom 103 games 39 wins 37 losses.
Is that an going to take us forward?

9.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 16:21:35
I thought you werecreferring to the important stats thst of forest ff79. His league stats are 38%. I would not count the cup for obvious reasons. Anyway its all paper talk. I think any of the mentioned nsmes would be better balance than mr mark warburton.

10.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 17:02:02
Point is heckingbottoms stats are worst,so I don't see it working out.

11.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 17:26:30
Sir Brian's stats were dreadful at Brighton, never should have touched him !
CARLO

12.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 18:23:57
Brighton was too much of a culture shock for him and the goldstone too much of a s--t hole for him🎲😁😁

13.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 20:30:52
He also did badly at Leeds as he lost the dressing room,there loss our gain.
Losing the dressing room?
Players need to behave do as their told or ship out.
They get paid to play football very hansomeley,not to question the manager.
That's one thing sir Brian didn't tolerate,anyone questioning his own ability,especially a player.
We have some shipping to do.

14.) 04 Jan 2018
04 Jan 2018 22:30:35
All this win % talk is bubbles. Based on his stats at Leeds Utd we should never have appointed Cloughie and based on this forums demanding criteria Klopp at less than 50% should not be considered?