Nottingham Forest Rumours Archive March 31 2012


Use our rumours form to send us SHORT_NAME transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

31 Mar 2012 11:29:51
Rumour has it forest will be selling naming rights to the ground in order to raise extra money, goodbye 'city ground'

Believable8 Unbelievable10

That would be a sombre day but if needs must...

Agree6 Disagree2

I heard it 3 years ago. It was ballcocks then and it's ballcocks now.

Agree5 Disagree5

Maybe true as it seems it will soon be the norm to sell naming rights to produce extra income to spend on players + wages so if that makes us a better team then so be it. it will be a sad day if it does happen but we will all know it as the city ground

Agree5 Disagree3

The victor chandler city ground

Agree1 Disagree5

The City Ground is a rubbish name and who cares if a corporate wants to pay lots of money to rename it.

Let the corporates know it by some cac name and the fans should use another name such as 'Psychoville' :¬)

Agree6 Disagree6

We should do it & take the cash. It would only be the sponsors name on paper. The fans wouldn't stop calling it the city ground. Newcastle fans made a big fuss out of it.

Agree4 Disagree2

Sounds good

Forest v Bristol City at the Pyschoville Stadium

Agree1 Disagree1

How can they sell rights on a ground they don't own

Agree0 Disagree1

We own the stadium, we don't own the land it is on.
It's a bit like owning an apartment, you don't own the land it's on.
Whatever helps bring in money, I'm all for!

Hoppers u1

Agree2 Disagree1

It will always be the city ground to all of us. man city,newcastle,leicester(still s**t) have done it.Maybe it might be a good idea if we get to buy some new players with the money?

Agree2 Disagree1

Yep. Sponsors may change (as at Leicester) but the City Ground tag will stay whatever they chose to call it.

Agree1 Disagree1

Yep but if you want to bend the financial fair play rules it's the way forward, why do you think stadia get renamed? ? ? ?

Agree1 Disagree0