11 Oct 2015 06:05:09
Ward injured again" why do we sign players with history of injuries?


1.) 11 Oct 2015
11 Oct 2015 08:03:55
Can't see anything about this.if true I wonder what df will blame it on.again if true he must not be looking after himself as this would be the third time tho season he's been injured.
Or will df do the right thing and admit it's his fault for buying a injury prone player like we all knew and he said he wouldn't buy this sort of player.


2.) 11 Oct 2015
11 Oct 2015 10:13:19
I assume he got injured for N.Ireland as he lasted 80 minutes?


3.) 11 Oct 2015
11 Oct 2015 11:13:53
Yes got injured playing for Northern Ireland.


4.) 11 Oct 2015
11 Oct 2015 13:39:05
and this is DF's fault for what reason exactly?


5.) 11 Oct 2015
11 Oct 2015 15:41:46
He runs around like a headless tool with no end result anyway.


6.) 11 Oct 2015
11 Oct 2015 16:04:37
Because ward has a shocking injury history a df bought him in.but of late he has moaned about injuries and players not looking after themselves yet he bought In a injury prone player.
When df first started he said he would be looking into the injuries we pick up and will make sure full medicals are completed then got ward in who we all know is injury prone and this is the bloke running our team.what hope have we got?


7.) 11 Oct 2015
11 Oct 2015 17:02:08
Erm Ward is on the bench,and i wish we had ten more chickens like him


8.) 11 Oct 2015
11 Oct 2015 18:23:58
Look at wards average games played per season and tell me how he has a shocking injury record please?


9.) 12 Oct 2015
12 Oct 2015 07:15:48
Last season he missed 22 league games.he featured in 30 of Derbys games,they played 47 league games and 8 cup games.thats 55 games so he missed 25 games.thats nearly half the games derby played.his minutes played for those games works out at 60 mins per game.and last season was one of his best seasons for games played.


10.) 12 Oct 2015
12 Oct 2015 09:23:59
I agree, even in the Nottingham post comment section people were saying that we shouldn't sign Ward because they knew then that he was injury prone and Forest have far too many sick notes as it is.


11.) 12 Oct 2015
12 Oct 2015 09:57:51
Ward was always a risk worth taking for that sort of money in my opinion.

We ain't got many who are as direct as Ward, or many who have the stomach for a tear up.

One of our better players so far this season & he's versatile.


12.) 12 Oct 2015
12 Oct 2015 10:04:40
You're like a politician uptheforest twisting figures to suit. The majority of games missed last season was due to being dropped or sitting on the bench, not injury. And when he didn't play the 90 mins that was because he was substituted!!


13.) 12 Oct 2015
12 Oct 2015 12:54:15
He was substituted because 60mins is all they can trust him to play.they had to manage him because of his tissue hamstrings.


14.) 12 Oct 2015
12 Oct 2015 15:11:33
How come Ward was on the bench in Northern Ireland last match if he was not fit?


15.) 12 Oct 2015
12 Oct 2015 17:46:55
Christ, now you were the Derby physio last season then!!!?


16.) 12 Oct 2015
12 Oct 2015 20:52:11
No keeno but it's common sense.you can't play a player that has bad hamstrings every game for 90mins.yoj have to look after him or he will be out for 4-6 weeks on a regular basis just as derby did in previous seasons.is that really that hard to understand?


17.) 13 Oct 2015
12 Oct 2015 22:24:45
It's not hard to understand but my point is that u know absolutely nothing about the individual or his physical issues and you certainly know absolutely nothing about the managers reasons for him not playing for only 60 minutes. You patronise people constantly in your posts like your coming from a factual position of knowledge. When in fact you know about as minimal as the rest of us!


18.) 13 Oct 2015
13 Oct 2015 08:44:30
It must be the Trent water used on the pitches at City Ground and Pride Park?

Ward
Earnshaw
Commons
Tyson

All play with dodgy hamstrings