05 Oct 2025 22:58:01
Couldn't tell in real time but that was 100% a foul on MGW for their opening goal, takes the p*ss VAR did nothing. ?.

1.) 06 Oct 2025
05 Oct 2025 23:13:02
And adding to that, the elbow from the burnley lad, how isn't that a red? VAR is a fooking joke?.

2.) 06 Oct 2025
06 Oct 2025 05:43:40
Never a foul. Guimaraes got the ball first.

3.) 06 Oct 2025
06 Oct 2025 07:38:04
Wouldn't be Forest if we hadn't ridiculous decisions against us. MOTD never even mentioned it! ???.

4.) 06 Oct 2025
06 Oct 2025 07:52:41
Add to that the foul in the build up to the Danish sides breakaway third goal.

5.) 06 Oct 2025
06 Oct 2025 09:10:02
MOTD didn't mention it because it wasn't a foul. Not worth mentioning as it was nowhere near a foul.

6.) 06 Oct 2025
06 Oct 2025 09:54:33
Agreed Ravers. No foul.

7.) 06 Oct 2025
06 Oct 2025 10:02:22
Ravers, he may of got a touch on the ball but running through the back of a player is still a foul, i believe these days its called excessive force. Granted i'm all for more contact and proper tackles but nine times out of ten that's a foul. Just want some consistency from the officials, its not like they don't have two opportunities to make the correct decision what with VAR always being eager to interfere. ?.