23 Jun 2015 08:37:45
burnley have made an umdisclosed offer for Nottingham Forest winger Jamie Paterson.

- SSN


1.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 11:08:27
Get as much money as we can. Burnley can afford 1 million + even if he is not worth that on current form plus insert a sell on clause. At least when he improves which he's bound to we can get some more £ when he is sold again.


2.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 15:03:47
If he's bound to improve, why not keep him? He was on fire season before last, he can do that again.


3.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 15:11:50
Walsall also will benefit if they buy him as they have got a sell on clause. Unfortunately Burnley won't offer much just like they tried with Lansbury.


4.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 15:44:46
Sorry but DF is starting to worry me! By letting JP go he is sending the wrong message! He hasn't suddenly become a bad player! The problem lies in the coaching system somewhere over the years! We have lost too many who have made good after leaving the CG!


5.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 15:59:00
He had his chances under SP and DF. Looks like poor attitude and being lightweight have cost him. Let him go, we have better in U21s.


6.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 16:16:09
Burnley didn't offer much?have a day off.they offered what he was worth.


7.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 16:33:46
Bsered.


When it came to Radi having a poor attitude, and being lightweight, Wilderbeast said a player with natural talent should be kept, and he can train to stop being a lightweight.


8.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 16:38:47
Easy guys! Burley making an offer is not the same as dougie letting him go.


9.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 16:41:05
He will have to improve a hell of a lot to get in Burnley's side


10.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 17:11:53
We should swap him for boyd minus the eye test.


11.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 17:46:42
You cannot compare Radi and Paterson. I would still like to know what evidence riverofoaks has got that Radi has a bad attitude which I know for a fact Paterson has continually showed.


12.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 17:48:17
haha will anyone see the logic in that though North London Red?


13.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 18:24:38
Wilderbeast. How long has Radi been in English football, yet he has not bulked himself up, or got himself fit enough ie bad attitude.

As Ed001 said there is no excuse for a professional footballer to lack fitness.


14.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 19:45:28
Radi trains as hard as anyone and is as fit as a butchers dog riverofoaks which is nothing to do with being lightweight. But in your world this somehow gives him a bad attitude


15.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 20:23:52
Johnnyv77. this is a rumours site.

Losing faith in the manager because you read that another club MAY have made an offer for one of our players is just odd!


16.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 20:29:47
If he is fit as a butchers dog, why has he not got the energy to last a whole game?

As for a bad attitude, it comes in different forms. If your game, or body is lacking in a particular department,then it shows a bad attitude not to put it right.

The length of time Radi has known them to be deficient, yet no improvement. Why.


17.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 20:34:14
River: I think Pato lacks real commitment both in tackling and in being part of a team effort and that's why I feel he's lightweight. He stands on the edges of play and can occasionally pick up good goals, but if you look at the teams that have gone up to Premier in recent years, W. Brom, Leicester, etc. they are all huge blokes who run fast and tackle hard. In every team we have crafty little ball players - Reid, Osborn, but they need big blokes around them. As for Radi: he was good when he came, but in the last few years he has lost his energy and desire coupled with a loss of speed and ability, so for me he's of little use now. DF needs a big clear-out and a system that players fit into and buy into; we can't just keep plugging holes in the team and hoping somehow we will do better.


18.) 23 Jun 2015
23 Jun 2015 20:56:53
Bsered.

At least that is constructive criticism, and makes sense.